Most EIRs are copy-pasted out of PAS 1192 or written so vaguely that no contractor knows what to deliver, so they don't. This template forces every requirement down to a discipline, an LOIN, a CDE folder, and an acceptance gate, so the model that lands is the one you actually asked for.
The full EIR, structured to ISO 19650 Part 1. Pre-written clauses for purpose, milestones, exchange points, software, security, and acceptance, with prompts where your project-specific scope goes.
Level of Information Need broken down by discipline and by stage, geometry, alphanumeric data, documentation. No more "LOD 400" as a single number that means nothing.
Information delivery plan tied to design and construction milestones. Who issues what, into which CDE container, by which date, pre-mapped so you can drop in dates and assignees.
The pass/fail checks we run on incoming models before they're accepted into shared. Geometry, naming, parameters, clash hygiene. If it doesn't pass, it goes back, no negotiation.
You need a BIM spec your consultants and main contractor can't fudge, and that hands you a usable asset model at PC.
You need the FM data, the geometry hygiene, and the handover structure defined upstream, not negotiated at closeout.
You need an EIR that's audit-defensible, mandate-aligned, and written in language a contractor can actually price.
This is the EIR pattern we recommend to developer-side clients. ISO 19650-aligned, written for enforcement not theatre, the same structure we use to govern information delivery across our own live engagements.