Systematized BIM services in Frankfurt.

Yes. A delivery lead owns your programme and embeds in your coordination, backed by 260+ engineers producing federated, clash-managed models before your trades mobilise. On vertical programmes the repetition that multiplies errors multiplies the savings once the model is right. Capacity scales with the tower rather than sitting on your payroll, and one name stays accountable throughout.

Yes. Our consultants embed in your delivery, author the BEP, hold your LOD and coordinate from core-and-shell through tenant fit-out to ISO 19650. Your studio holds the design intent; we hold the deadline on the production packages. One named lead is accountable across the programme, so the riser and service routing resolve once in the model rather than floor by floor on site.

Yes. We scan the existing structure, register the point cloud and build a coordinated record model that matches what stands, useful when a tower fit-out or refurbishment works into an occupied base. Every discipline then coordinates against that verified base rather than assumed dimensions. It gives your team certainty on the shell before new services are routed through it.

Architecture, structure and MEP, with the MEP-dense riser and ceiling-void coordination that vertical work demands, authored in Revit and federated in Navisworks for regular clash cycles. Every file clears the Author-Checker-Approver gate against your BEP before issue. Conflicts resolve in the model where they cost hours, not up the full height of the tower where they cost site days.

Scope, disciplines, LOD and programme length set it. A service-dense tower modelled to a high LOD carries more coordination hours than a low-rise package, so we scope to the actual work rather than a day rate. The lowest-risk way to see how we manage riser clashes is a zero-cost pilot on one package before the full programme commits.