Federated BIM model, mixed-use development

Systematized BIM services in Sweden.

Production, coordination and governance to ISO 19650, delivered as a full BIM team for consultants, contractors and developers. No internal hire, no management overhead.

Frameworks run for years. Quality has to hold that long.

Framework partners are selected on steadiness, and ad-hoc capacity cannot promise it. The same QA gates in year one and year five, with ERP records that show you exactly what was delivered, package by package.

Prestige One
Al-Futtaim
AECOM
Dar Al-Handasah
Arup
WA International
SCDA
Dezigntechnic
H2R Design
Innovo
M4
MNG
Günal
ALEC
ALEMCO
Voltas
ALEC Fitout
DEPA
Al Tayer Stocks
Abaad Wood
Prestige One
Al-Futtaim
AECOM
Dar Al-Handasah
Arup
WA International
SCDA
Dezigntechnic
H2R Design
Innovo
M4
MNG
Günal
ALEC
ALEMCO
Voltas
ALEC Fitout
DEPA
Al Tayer Stocks
Abaad Wood

The full scope, stable for years

Eight capabilities from one team, steady enough to anchor a framework and able to follow its peaks.

  • 3D BIM modelling

    Revit and Civil 3D production for housing and infrastructure, federated, clash-managed and consistent across phases.

  • Revit family creation

    Type-component libraries built to your standard once and reused programme-wide, so repetition keeps paying back.

  • 4D, 5D and 6D simulation

    4D phasing across multi-year delivery, 5D cost per stage, and 6D operational data aligned to your digitalisation goals.

  • Shop drawings & detailing

    Shop drawings for industrialised and conventional construction, coordinated in the model before fabrication.

  • Scan to BIM

    Existing estates and civil assets scanned and rebuilt as reliable models for renewal programmes.

  • CAD to BIM conversion

    Archive drawings converted into coordinated models, giving long-held assets a usable digital record.

  • BIM for facility management

    Structured handover data feeding municipal and institutional CAFM systems, validated before delivery.

  • Quantity take-off & BOQ

    Model-based take-off with consistent measurement rules across the whole programme, not just the package.

Three sets of eyes before it leaves.

Every JES deliverable moves through a fixed Author-Checker-Approver gate, tracked in the CDE. The same standard whether it's engineer 3 or engineer 250.

Author
Model and documentation produced to the MIDP task card. Self-review against the project QA checklist before submission.
Status: WIP
Checker
Independent review against the BEP and federated model. Defects logged, deviation report returned to Author.
Output: Deviation report
Approver
Signed off against EIR and LOIN. Promoted from WIP to Shared or Published in the CDE.
Status: Published

Across a long programme the small failures compound: standards drifting, quality varying, data degrading phase by phase. The system is built against drift: three signatures per file, every file, every year.

Delivered across multi-year programmes

Metro, aviation and development programmes delivered to ISO 19650 in the Gulf over multi-year engagements, several of which became framework relationships.

View all

Common questions about BIM in Sweden

Both. We produce the models, drawings and coordination and we govern the standards: the BEP, the CDE and the gate every file passes. One accountable team runs both, which is what a multi-year framework needs. You do not manage a consultancy that advises and a separate shop that draws, you manage one delivery lead across the programme.

Yes. You get a dedicated outsourced BIM team under one named lead, with the steadiness a framework partner has to promise and ad-hoc capacity cannot. Capacity scales against the programme rather than a permanent hire. The hundredth deliverable clears the same gate as the first, with an ERP record showing exactly what was delivered.

Yes. Our consultants embed in your delivery, author the BEP and LOD schedule and hold the work to ISO 19650 across every phase. One named lead stays accountable as teams rotate over the years. The standards, the naming logic and the CDE discipline do not drift, and the ERP trail proves it package by package.

Yes. We scan existing stock, from post-war housing estates to civil assets, and rebuild the point cloud into a coordinated record model. Architectural, structural and MEP then coordinate against that verified base. For renewal programmes and repeated housing types it gives you one reliable starting point that every later phase can build on.

Architectural, structural and MEP. We author them in Revit and federate them in Navisworks with regular clash cycles on one model, checked and approved against the BEP before issue. On industrialised and repeated construction, consistency of measurement matters as much as accuracy, so we get the first module exactly right and hold it across every repetition.

Cost follows scope, the disciplines involved, the LOD you need and the programme length, so we scope each engagement to the actual work rather than a day rate. A multi-year framework carries more than a single package. The zero-cost pilot on one package lets you test the gate and the ERP record before you commit.